ifinnegan wrote: “You are a true believer!”
No, a true sceptic who is suspicious of both arguments.
—
That’s a good way to be.
What mechanisms are there to determine the validity of either argument?
For the inflated argument there is the audit where examples of false attribution, such as the accidental overdose in January being attributed to a positive test for SARS-2 virus in October, can be found.
What mechanism will find false negatives? What would find people who died of Covid but were not reported as dying of Covid?
ifinnegan wrote: “For the inflated argument there is the audit where examples of false attribution, such as the accidental overdose in January being attributed to a positive test for SARS-2 virus in October, can be found.”
“What mechanism will find false negatives? What would find people who died of Covid but were not reported as dying of Covid?”
The false positives will get all the press while the false negatives will only rarely be discovered.
I believe that the after action reports, say four/five years in the future, will provide the most interesting reading.