NO. Just no
They will try that much is certain. There are three bills up for passing in a government that is now one party rule for at least two years. So yes they will try to ban semi autos for certain as well as standard capacity magazines and private sales. Those are 100% going to be signed into law. They will try for mental health checks, insurance and buybacks those laws will also likely pass and be signed how well they are enforced is the question.
They can ban them. Whether or not millions will comply is another matter altogether.
No.
Butt, butt, butt what about their 2nd amendme............ Oh.
Australia does not have a constitution or 2nd amendment.
If the “Supreme” Court can find abortion in the Constitution... if they can find sodomy in the Constitution they can certainly “find” that the 2nd amendment “shall not be infringed” does not mean shall not be infringed! There will be a mass shooting in the near future. Congress is just waiting for the day of the shooting to ram through “legislation” to place on Joseph Stolen’s desk to sign in to law to get the ball rolling. The “Supreme” Court will decimate the 2nd amendment “for the children.”
2nd Amendment stands in their way. Australia doesn’t have one.
Jamaica has very high gun violence numbers and strict gun control. Jamaica is an island. The nearest land mass to Jamaica is Cuba, 90 miles away. I highly doubt the Jamaicans are getting guns from Cuba. Next is Haiti, 118 miles away. Same story.
Read bill text in the link above. Prepare for resistance.
I am not a criminal. I’m never going to shoot anyone unless justified by the law.
However, these laws will make me a criminal over night without any action from me.
How does that help?
My blood pressure is too high as it is. I better not read this.
"....Psychological and psychiatric assessments
Descriptions of Bryant's behaviour as an adolescent show that he continued to be disturbed and outlined the possibility of an intellectual disability. When leaving school in 1983, he was assessed for a disability pension by a psychiatrist who wrote: "Cannot read or write. Does a bit of gardening and watches TV ... Only his parents' efforts prevent further deterioration. Could be schizophrenic and parents face a bleak future with him."[5] Bryant received a disability pension, though he also worked as a handyman and gardener.[5] In an examination after the massacre, forensic psychiatrist Ian Joblin found Bryant to be borderline mentally disabled, with an I.Q. of 66, equivalent to an 11-year-old.[6][7]
There is no way this nutbar should have been near any firearm.
[Paraphrase of a conversation between a gun grabber and a patriot]
Gungrabber - We will outlaw all civilian ownership of guns
Patriot - I will not comply with such laws
Gungrabber - Then we will send the police to confiscate your guns
Patriot - Bold of you to assume that I am going to wait for the police to come take them
Gungrabber - what???!!!???
The only reason for any government to insist on disarming its subjects is so it can do things to them for which the people would shoot them.
The hill to die on.
They will and can try.
Good luck with that.
That moment when you realize your Second Amendment rights depend upon the moral courage of Joe Manchin...
John Roberts used the excuse not to hear any election rigging cases that it would cause violence to rule in such a case. I could very easily see this nitwit using the same argument to reinterpret the 2nd Amendment...