I always thought the simple thing to do would be for some shareholders to file suit, alleging that management isn’t entitled to loot their assets to pursue their personal political agendas, but for some reason, no one has ever filed a suit like that. After Twitter lost a billion dollars in market value from purging the President and thousands of accounts, I was astounded not to see such a suit.
The Republicans didn’t say anything when he was putting drop boxes in Democrat areas.
Twitter stock is up over 30% since they permanently banned Trump.
My Speculation w/o any Proof:
Zuck and his close enablers always have the option to ‘tinker’ with the equities. Maybe offer some preferred stock to certain people who show support for various plans and experiments. Maybe board members have a choice of earning some very easy money, based on (unofficial) insider info, or not. No one’s forcing them to invest more.
For those who don’t care about the money, maybe they can become Project Leader of some new production line. Some of such products will never be seen in any store. They will exist only on the drawing boards, as a method of ‘dignified busywork’, quarterly reports and everything.
There are various incentives the CEO could dangle in front of those who decide to keep Zuck in luck just a little bit longer.