Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel
It’s sad that the B1 is so underrated.

The B-1B is so underrated because it has been such a disappointing aircraft from it's introduction into service.

It has one of the, if not the worst Fully Mission Capable rates in the Air Force. It was originally designed as a high altitude, high Mach dash speed strategic bomber, then was transformed into a low-level subsonic penetrating bomber.

It's first several decades of service were strictly in the Nuclear deterrent role, with no conventional weapons capability at all.

After the B-2 came online, it was upgraded to carry conventional bombs and use the Sniper targeting pod, and was useful in the W.O.T. as a loitering bomb truck, but still suffered from the lowest availability rates in the Air Force.

Maintenance per flying hour is a staggering 150 maintenance hours per flying hour.

The thing was a sexy aircraft, and was supposed to be a replacement for the B-52. It never fulfilled that role, and needs to be retired when the B-21 comes online.

17 posted on 03/03/2021 7:16:51 AM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Bias alert. My father worked majorly on B1 sensor systems.

He had a very different view of the B1, as a bomber used extensively but basically never mentioned in news reports, etc.


24 posted on 03/03/2021 8:52:29 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs. I )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson