Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: brownsfan

“If I take the vaccine I must still mask up, and distance.”

That’s because the “vaccine” is leaky. It does not confer sterilizing immunity because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus. Infection of the host and the transmission of the virus are not inhibited by the vaccine.

Look up Mareks disease in poultry for an analogy. Pay attention to Prevention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek%27s_disease

“Under normal conditions, highly virulent strains of the virus are not selected. A highly virulent strain would kill the host before the virus would have an opportunity to transmit to other potential hosts and replicate. Thus, less virulent strains are selected. These strains are virulent enough to induce symptoms but not enough to kill the host, allowing further transmission. However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains.[12] The vaccine’s inability to prevent infection and transmission allows the spread of highly virulent strains among vaccinated chickens. The fitness of the more virulent strains are increased by the vaccine.


18 posted on 03/02/2021 8:33:20 AM PST by Polynikes ( Hakkaa paalle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Polynikes

“That’s because the “vaccine” is leaky.”

If I understand that, we’re creating a super coronavirus with the vaccinations?


21 posted on 03/02/2021 8:38:04 AM PST by brownsfan (Term limits! Without term limits, we are doomed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Polynikes

[[That’s because the “vaccine” is leaky. It does not confer sterilizing immunity because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus. Infection of the host and the transmission of the virus are not inhibited by the vaccine.]]

True BUT... this virus on its own is 99.6% survivable overall. When fol,folks, bet vaccinated, they are far less likely to transmit the virus because 1 the viral load is significantly if the person get sthe virus, th a nks to the vaccine, and 2 even if the person does become symptomatic, they Will Not be coughing and sneezing nearly as bad as they would have without the vaccine, so they will not be spreading it nearly as much, and again, the viral load Wil, be greatly reduced, so that is a plus too if they become symptomatic According to docs discussing the issue.

A d don’t forget, we are reaching g herd immunity soon, April I thjnk they 3stimated. So all this is gonna be moot soon anyways supposedly, if there is any truth to the herd immunity stuff.

Trying to make my mind u
Whether to just stay o. Ivermectin, get the virus. Get natuea, immunity that way, or get the vaccine. In high risk category. Re.atives too.. All these conflicting reports have people very confused. Myself included. Now this possigle long term stuff adds another wrinkle to the story. Just when I seem to be settled one way or the other, along comes another article to cause doubt. I had seen this articles premise before though, but not in such detail.

Now we find a vaccine “could be” setting up the masses for the creati o n of a more deadly form possibly... key word possibly. Ugggh


40 posted on 03/02/2021 9:26:59 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson