This was the article from Gateway Pundit entitled:
UNCOVERED: Conman With Long History of Deceit, Dennis Montgomery, Inserted False Information Into Election Fraud Investigation, Who’s Paying Him?
The article claims that false information on the 2020 election fraud from an individual named Dennis Montgomery was deliberately inserted in the narrative to sidetrack and defraud the effort to uncover the 2020 election fraud.
With this, one of the key witnesses in Mike Lindell's film - ABSOLUTE PROOF, Mary Fanning and the data she presented that purports to show foreign election intrusion via the timestamped source IP Address and Target IP Address became suspect.
Now in this rebuttal, Mary Fanning responds to the allegation.
I look forward to the Dominion Voting machine lawsuit against Mike Lindell where his lawyers will be issuing discovery motions for the original source of the “Absolute Proof” log data. If the government fights this on national security issues it will confirm the validity of the data. If they claim it doesn’t exist it will require issuing subpoenas for all the NSA and CIA people who Montgomery worked with right up to and including John Brennen.
My bet is that Dominion never actually serves Lindell on the suit because they just wanted to freeze him from talking about it like they did with the networks. Mike is not someone who can be silenced.
When I read the GP article I thought it sounded real fishy.
The writing is such an incoherent mishmash. While it attempts to state various facts, it’s like reading computer spaghetti code. It all might be in there, but it needs to be organized and put in a clear and concise manner.
IPv6 has IP addresses, referring to iNet location, that has format very similar to MAC Ids. So no wonder they didn't match, but looked like something from a random number generator. Apelbaum is incompetent to testify.
So any explanation of how Mike Lindell's report was created still remains unpresented. Until the data elements of all the types of data packets sent around the world that ended up in the report are defined, we have no clue how valuable that report from Hammer and / or Scorecard truly is.
Well, Mary should learn how to write in a manner where she can be followed and understood. This isn’t it.
Johnson and Montgomery are both highly questionable, but it’s interesting they’re at odds over this.
Risen Cleared on Labeling CIA Contractor a ‘Con Artist’
July 18, 2016ADAM KLASFELD
. . .
Risen reported that two of Montgomery’s once-trusted associates denounced the man in public documents.
One was Montgomery’s former lawyer Michael Flynn, whom the ruling quotes calling his ex-client a “hacker,” “fraud” and “con man.”
Another was Montgomery’s financial backer Warren Trepp, who told the FBI that his business partner puffed up his computer expertise, according to the ruling.