Replies

safe, cheap, clean, and virtually unlimited thorium nuclear power

I'm with you on the need for LFTRs.

Why does Gates spend so much of his fortune on nuclear, rather than LFTRs? All he needs is a small course correction. It's not as if he needs to give up his leftist ideas. LFTRs is an easy solution for all stripes.

Why does Gates spend so much of his fortune on nuclear, rather than LFTRs? All he needs is a small course correction.

You're assuming his ideas are what you think they are. Again, every aspect of what we see from the left is a facade to mask the actual agenda, which is to get rid of 90% of humanity and enslave the rest. It's the Malthusian Fallacy, which has existed for 200+ years.

The false premise is simple. There's not enough for everyone. There are too many people. The only solution is drastic reduction of the global population. We can't just murder everyone (at least right away) so here's what we do:

Stop reproduction. Promote abortion, birth control, and all forms of sterile sex. That will distract the masses from the next step, which is:
Reduce the excess useless population among the sick, elderly, and mentally incompetent by introducing euthanasia. Initially as a "compassionate" measure but gradually shifting from "right to die" to "duty to die" mindset.
Beyond that we have:
Promote endless wars to attrit excess able-bodied young alpha males. As a not insignificant side benefit, make tons of money selling arms to both sides in every conflict.
Reshape culture to denigrate family and self-reliance and to look to the State for the answer to all problems. We do that by:
Take over all education, media, and pop culture to endlessly reinforce all of the above and prevent people from actually noticing what's happening.

This agenda completely explains everything you see that "doesn't make sense". Does it advance the Malthusian agenda? Then support it. If it does not, then oppose and denigrate it, especially among the young, who are the easiest to manipulate.