RE: Mary Fanning and Alan Jones are investigative reporters who are not fools. If they have a true whistleblower that stands behind this data then it needs to be vetted in court whether Dennis Montgomery is involved or not.
Let me say this - Mary’s evidence is the kind of thing that would make a good case for foreign election interference in our election - but she MUST ( repeat MUST) validate it for it to be acceptable in a court or to the public.
And here’s the problem I have with Lindell’s film: Fanning had a spread sheet listing the state computers/tabulators, a remote computer accessing the state computer/tabulator, which ones tried to access the state computer, which ones succeeded and how many votes were flipped. Lindell is correct, this is absolute proof- but, but but — ONLY IF Fanning’s data came from the machines she said it does.
Lindell missed an opportunity to explain where she got her into, and because he didn’t, his video isn’t changing any minds, it will only be preaching to the choir. Heck, She didn’t even FaceTime him like his other “guests.”
Don’t get me wrong, I love Mike Lindell. I bought his products and encouraged friends and family to do likewise when I heard that he was going to be canceled by the cowardly retailers like Kohls.
I don’t think he’s crazy or dishonest. But what about Mary Fanning? I don’t know the first thing about her. I think that the conclusions Fanning presented aren’t believable unless we know where she got the info. If she got it from Montgomery. alas, that’s a very bad sign.... :(
RE: Mary Fanning and Alan Jones are investigative reporters who are not fools.
______________________________
There are fools being coned ever minute. I put my money on Mike Zullo who knew Montgomery before Montgomery was cool and he says the guy is a super con artist. Mike is more than an investigative reporter, he is a LEO who has worked snake informants in the past.