Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: StAnDeliver
I am sorry but could you read Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5, and Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7.

Judicial interpretation of the impeachment trail is verboten, Constitutionally and historically (Look at the Johnson trial and how the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS was told to piss off with his opinions).

Also



Are you one of those Q "The 4chan tripfag" schizoids? Stay off the tripcodes as well.
199 posted on 02/03/2021 1:04:38 PM PST by rollo tomasi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi

BTTT


200 posted on 02/03/2021 1:29:49 PM PST by freepersup (“Those who conceal crimes are preparing to commit new ones.” ~Vuk Draskovic~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: rollo tomasi
"I could read you Art. 1, Sec. 2 and 3 which do not refute the fact that Impeachment Trial interlocutory cases can reach SCOTUS in media res, and also do not refute that Madison specifically envisioned the Chief Justice as Presiding Officer to avoid that very scenario...Up until the last draft of the Constitution, the Supreme Court was the original Impeachment Trial venue."

I agree with everything you just said.


215 posted on 02/05/2021 3:24:24 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Eric Coomer of Dominion Voting Systems Is The Blue Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson