[EasySt]

“ In other words, Kollerstrom is probably not the best guy to invoke in support of your beliefs. ”

Someday people are going to realize that folks like Kollerstrom are tools
aimed at keeping certain truths unbelievable.

There are very specific reasons to involve the Alex Jones and Kollerstrom
types, whenever certain things start to get any traction.

Sulification of truth is the order of business of every intelligence agent.

-Easy

[humblegunner]

Someday people are going to realize that folks like Kollerstrom are tools aimed at keeping certain truths unbelievable.

But Qtards and anons already know, huh?

What is that "knowing" doing for you?

[Steve_Seattle]

"There are very specific reasons to involve the Alex Jones and Kollerstrom types, whenever certain things start to get any traction."

We saw an example on here just yesterday or the day before. Someone posted a story from (I think) The Hill, which made a big deal about the fact that Alex Jones was at the January 6th rally. Even though Jones was using a bullhorn at the rally, telling people to remain peaceful and back away from the area where the trouble was, the whole thrust of the article was an effort in guilt-by-association to put the entire rally in disrepute merely because Jones was there.