Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

No wonder Obama tried to get rid of it.

It was the USAF that wanted (and still does) want it gone. Its just not sexy, flies too slow, and is old. They want new toys like the floppadouza F-35 to replace it for ground missions with a mere 215 rounds firing from 10,000 ft and no armor.

They’ve sort of relented and re-winged several hundred A-10s, upgraded the cockpit, rearmed with new bombs and new missiles.


12 posted on 01/19/2021 7:28:28 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: PIF

It was explained to me that the A-10 is a single mission jet, and the USAF feels the future is a multi-mission jet. More bank for the various missions.

Balderdash. There is no replacement that can do the job.

Back in the early 80’s the USAF, being run by sexy-jet fighter pilots that mocked the low and slow non-after-burning A-10s, they started a campaign to kill the A-10 to buy more F-16s. Then Gulf War came along and proved their worth big time.

The A-10 proved itself over and over so today with upgrades and such, planned to serve past 2030.


20 posted on 01/19/2021 7:53:58 AM PST by Hulka ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson