Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BiglyCommentary

First I did answer your questions. Second, you have demonstrated complete ignorance in your posts about amending the constitution by a convention of states. I’m not getting into specifics about Texas. You can do your own research. I don’t have any more time to waste. .


166 posted on 01/10/2021 11:19:17 PM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: precisionshootist

You DID NOT. I ASKED YOU A DIRECT AND SIMPLE QUESTION, Your answer: “They should do what they want” IS NOT A DIRECT ANSWER. YES OR NO IS A DIRECT ANSWER. EVASIVE. AND WHY THE CONTINUED EVASIVENESS, DODGING, BOBBING, WEAVING?

Because you know damned well that by saying “Yes”, it would expose and show what a delusional FOOL’S ERRAND you are on, by creating a US Senate with 100 RAT Senators and 528 RAT congressman, and a packed 100% liberal/leftist SCOTUS, with all that would mean.

And if you answer “NO”, it would show that your personal choice of YES was a fraud, not worthy of others to do.

And you can’t give one single solitary amendment because it would get laughed at, since there will always be at least 13 blue states that would vote NO, and so once again, show what a FOOL’S ERRAND you are on.

Just a poser that will accomplish ZIP, ZERO, no real positive change that stands a SNOWBALLS CHANCE IN HELL of doing anything for the country. Good riddance.


167 posted on 01/10/2021 11:50:11 PM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson