this is all very interesting. truly, it is. but a court of law is never, ever going to accept mathematical inference as evidence . . . of anything.
wrong
PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error
http://www.repdiamond.com/News/18754/Latest-News/PA-Lawmakers-Numbers-Don%E2%80%99t-Add-Up,-Certification-of-Presidential-Results-Premature-and-In-Error
Except in cases involving disparate impacts on protected groups.
The courts will not be considering evidence of fraud.
The only way the courts will get involved is to settle Constitutional disputes.
For example, if the state legislatures of any of the contested states move to rescind their illegitimate certifications, and their authority to do so is challenged - the courts will get involved in such a dispute.
In such a case, the courts will surely uphold the right of state legislatures to decertify or certify as they see fit, since this authority is clearly given to them in Article II, Section I, of the US Constitution.
The point of providing evidence of fraud is not to convince the courts of anything - it is not the courts place to settle whether there was fraud or not - only to settle whether or not Constitutional rights were violated. There may be some process cases taken up by the SC, such as the PA equal protection clause case - but even that case is likely to be deferred to the state legislature.
The purpose of showing evidence of fraud is to convince the state legislators of contested states that the certifications made by their respective Secretaries of State were in error and were not representative of a free and fair election.
The objections to electors and ensuing debates in the US House and Senate are really not going to determine the outcome - the way they will affect the outcome is indirect - this will be the first time many Americans get to see that there is a very strong case to be made - and much evidence and sworn testimony - that Joe Biden won this election by fraud.
The idea is to get the cat out of the bag.
As with the Russia collusion hoax,
As with the Kavanaugh hoax,
As with the Ukraine impeachment hoax,
Once the American people have heard both sides - the fake news narrative falls apart - Republicans realize they have no choice - and they fall in line.
“...mathematical inference as evidence...”
Also known as using smoke to prove the existence of fire.