Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JV3MRC

I wonder how far he’ll get. Missouri already is going for trump. Will he have say over other states or will they tell him to stay in your state? Will be interesting to say the least.


4 posted on 12/30/2020 12:13:39 PM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

I don’t know, but I am not in his state, but sent him an email to thank him for doing this.


16 posted on 12/30/2020 12:17:28 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

“No standing!” - SCOTUS


19 posted on 12/30/2020 12:18:57 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Leaders need to lead.


42 posted on 12/30/2020 12:44:47 PM PST by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Right, one has to wonder what these loner statements and declarations really accomplish. It’s nice to know Trump has a strong ally here and there, but doesn’t he need a majority at some point, in order to prevail?

Not necessarily.

Team Trump does not need to prove fraud “beyond a shadow of a doubt” - although that’s what the Democrats, the Globalists, and the fake news would have us think.

This is not a criminal case where the Democrats are “innocent until proven guilty”. Team Trump only needs to raise sufficient doubt in order to force them to back up these contested certifications. They have to be able to back them up - and they can’t.

If serious leaders like Josh Hawley, Rand Paul and others object - the Democrats in these contested states will be asked to provide evidence backing up their certifications - and if they refuse - the tide of public perception will turn against them with a vengeance.

The burden of proof is shifting to where it belongs: the Democrats will have to prove Joe Biden received a plurality of legitimate votes in these contested states. They will have to submit to a real audit.

It won’t be enough to simply say “you are a sore loser”, “you have no proof of fraud”, “you are too late - the elections have already been certified“, “you are attempting to disenfranchise voters”, etc..

They are being accused of certifying elections that were not certifiable - and so far, they have not come up with a shred of evidence defending those certifications. Because there isn’t any.

Look, I have no illusions that any bad guys will go to jail for election fraud - they won’t. Two tier justice system and all.. I get it.

But that doesn’t mean these false certifications will be allowed to stand without being questioned, or that the Harris/Biden will get a rubber stamp to be sworn in January 20th.

Enough people are asking questions now - maybe the Democrats will have some good answers - I don’t think so.


63 posted on 12/30/2020 1:14:04 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson