The error rate of 94% was reported by the actual director of elections for Fulton Co. The printing errors and other tricks were all part of the scam. By forcing all the ballots into adjudication they could be electronically modified to the desired results (as was seen in Antrim Co. MI). The adjudication was not monitored and apparently there was no log made of the changes so this is a forensically destructive process that would put a bank CEO in prison. This also explains why the ballot recount worked out so well because they counted the modified ballots and not the originals.
Any one of these facts would be grounds to decertify the vote totals.
+1