Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. Navy’s Zumwalt-Class Destroyer: Hype Or Historic?
19FortyFive ^ | 12/27/2020 | Peter Suicu

Posted on 12/27/2020 6:59:09 AM PST by Onthebrink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Tallguy
Rail Guns seem to have hit a technological dead-end. The Navy specified how many “shots” they required for the life of the rails and the prototypes are far, far below the specification. A half-way realistic fire-mission would wipe out “the barrels” (as it were). Not practical.

One alternate approach would be to have the part of the rail which experiences wear be able to be quickly swapped out.

Alternately, the power that would be used by a railgun, could also be used by a laser, and high power lasers are coming along.

21 posted on 12/27/2020 9:27:42 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Alternately, the power that would be used by a railgun, could also be used by a laser, and high power lasers are coming along.

Lasers have come a long way and they will be deployed on large surface combatants and fleet auxiliaries very soon. But they will be primarily defensive weapons slaved to the Aegis air defense net. The idea is that the laser is best used against fast & 'softer' air & surface targets (drones, helicopters, small boats and surface-to-surface missiles). You don't want to expend your limited supply of Standard & Sparrow missiles against targets that are on the edges of their engagement envelope or too cheap to make for a decent exchange.

22 posted on 12/27/2020 9:35:33 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Horrific. The comment about a “medium sea” semisubmersible and “no other vessel” is ludicrous. The engines of the Zumwalt cannot function on normal fuel. See: shakedown breakdown just before Panama Canal. Total breakdown.

No other vessel? See the “Littoral” designs for submarines with SLAM missiles and ship to ship. Shallow waters, and yes— medium seas.

A test bed vessel that proves a lot a crappy designs, and named after a test bed crappy admiral. Typical DOD waste and politics— right down to “green new deal” fuel.


23 posted on 12/27/2020 9:43:46 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Lot of time on his hands for an analysis of a fictional vessel... with... family members?! In reality a “test bed” of neo-global-interstellar socialism, fictionalized impossibities of utopia of a space “battleship”.

Hilarious, in fact. Don’t know if a naval architect friend has seen this— will send with a caveat for the time it takes. Wonder if there is such an analysis visible for existing weapons platforms of the Navy. Roddenberry was a weird pervo dude who saw the (Enterprise— what else) as a space version of a 5K crew aircraft carrier.

Highly exposed, vulnerable without support in a carrier group, and tech cover. Recently one was “brought out of service” by the assymetric warfare of the chi-coms who infected the crew allowed on shore leave at a “port of call” in... Da Nang Communist Vietnam. And the point of the spear of a CSG publicly exposed with it’s infection and parked at Guam. Captain rightly fired for his television we’re not at war (air force like) idiocy releasing the status to San Fran newspaper!


24 posted on 12/27/2020 9:57:18 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

I take it you’ve never seen the Darth Jar Jar theory video? Or any of the countless other Fan Theory videos?

People have a lot of free time, and had it even before the Kungflu.


25 posted on 12/27/2020 10:04:06 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

The more things change, the more they stay the same...🤦‍♂️


26 posted on 12/27/2020 10:25:35 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
No— my interests in sci-fi reside with Heinlein and other writers. Star Trek has some great early episodes written by some of them, Harlan Ellison for example. Thoughtful, well written— and Shatner occasionally ok.

Star Wars have not kept up with, having zero time for all the peregrination's of marketing— the abuses of Hollywood never answered for abysmal writing.

27 posted on 12/27/2020 12:51:56 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Sorry. But in the modern technological era, virtually all surface combatants are obsolete.


They are not actually obsolete, until they become actually obsolete.


28 posted on 12/27/2020 1:21:38 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson