The complaint against Wood is “verified” - i.e. it is signed under penalty of perjury - by four plaintiffs, not one! It includes actual documentary evidence (copies of business cards, screen shots of web pages, other court pleadings) that lay out details of the ill-fated partnership. The copy filed with the court apparently has an exhibit of a Settlement Agreement where Wood admitted to liability. But the copy I saw did not have that Exhibit attached.
The complaint also includes excerpts of communication from Wood - these are vulgarity-ridden, threatening, borderline extortion material, clearly depicting a mentally unstable, desperate, vacillating bully.
So the complaint rises above “allegations” and has solid, admissible evidentiary value.
The complaint states (under penalty of perjury) that Wood took partnership monies, and then SIGNED a settlement agreement, and then breached it.
Nobody is stopping Wood from using proper channels to address the allegations. Under Georgia Code ยง 9-10-111, he has to file an answer, addressing each paragraph, under penalty of perjury.
So, all he needs to do is tell the media: “look at my answer on file with the court, every allegation is addressed, under penalty of perjury.”
Wood is an incompetent lawyer, a thief, and a conman. PDJT and his supporter owe Wood less than ZERO.
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-9/chapter-10/article-5/9-10-111/
So, you are hostile to Lin Wood, excoriate him publicly, and want him to remain gagged and unable to respond in public? That does not seem fair.