Posted on 12/17/2020 6:59:31 AM PST by Lockbox
The two Republican candidates for the Senate seats in Georgia need to file suit now in every court in Georgia and Federal. They need to file a separate law suit for every issue they can think of such as the 85,000 new registered voters when only voters from the general election are allowed to vote in the runoff. Or the use of drop boxes which are passed the 120 day allowed period. Also, the use of the Dominion Voting System which has been demonstrated to be totally unreliable.
Regarding the new registered voters, they need to ask these voters not be allowed to vote, or if allowed to vote then their ballots be set aside, marked and segregated so after the election these ballots can be pulled out if the suit is successful.
The purpose of these law suits is to get these issues on the record. This boxes in the courts, they will have to dismiss the suits on the concept of No Standing. If the courts use the No Standing excuse to dismiss the suits, after the runoff new law suits cannot be dismissed because of Latches. Now the candidates should pass the three areas of Standing requirement. So if law suits are filled after the runoff, the courts are not allowed to use the Latches theory anymore and now the defendant also has standing!
Time to out lawfare the Libs!
(Excerpt) Read more at none.org ...
It’s Laches, not latches.
‘We don’t need your stinking latches........or laches... or courts! Just the badges!’
I don’t believe newly registered voters can’t legally vote in the election. That wouldn’t really make sense.
I predict the Dems will steal these two races, with the same kinds of things we saw last month being reported again, and neither Perdue or Loeffler will say a thing, for fear of being attacked by the media. Also it would be hard for them to explain why they are suddenly concerned with the same things they were unconcerned with before. If I’m right, we can hardly expect them to be saying something ahead of the election.
I heard that Stacey Abrams claims to have 85,000 new voter registrations!
It’s in the Georgia election code- you can not vote in run off unless you voted in the original election. Raffensperger is just ignoring this and everything else in the election code.
Are you a lawyer?
They don’t have standing now because their injury is hypothetical not actual. After the election, Laches.
PS. If a state of 29 Million Texans don’t have standing, why should one or two people have standing. [May the gods spit on the Supreme Court].
(10) The run-off primary, special primary runoff, run-off election, or special election runoff shall be a continuation of the primary, special primary, election, or special election for the particular office concerned. Only the electors who were duly registered to vote and not subsequently deemed disqualified to vote in the primary, special primary, election, or special election for candidates for that particular office shall be entitled to vote therein, and only those votes cast for the persons designated as candidates in such run-off primary, special primary runoff, run-off election, or special election runoff shall be counted in the tabulation and canvass of the votes cast. No elector shall vote in a run-off primary or special primary runoff in violation of Code Section 21-2-224 .
FYI
In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (90-1424), 504 U.S. 555 (1992), the Supreme Court created a three-part test to determine whether a party has standing to sue: Standing in Federal Court At the federal level, legal actions cannot be brought simply on the ground that an individual or group is displeased with a government action or law. Federal courts only have constitutional authority to resolve actual disputes (see Case or Controversy).
In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (90-1424), 504 U.S. 555 (1992), the Supreme Court created a three-part test to determine whether a party has standing to sue:
1. The plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact," meaning that the injury is of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent
2. There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct brought before the court
3. It must be likely, rather than speculative, that a favorable decision by the court will redress the injury
I wonder if our candidates are even aware of this and are working to stop that nappie headed ho from registering new voters for a runoff. As usual our guys will be a day late and a dollar short when it happens. We should have lawyers all over this and up the states arse demanding she be stopped and voters warned not to vote if newly registered.
that depends on what one is talking about...
in this case, you are connect.
ugh, darn that auto correct.
That’s why file suits now, courts will not be able to use Laches after the election because the candidate filed before. I do not see how a court can tell a defendant has No Standing before the election and Laches after the election on the same law suit!
I’m am not a lawyer.
Actually I think they do have standing because the injury is imminent - all candidates and all citizens have a right to a fair election under the laws of the place where they seek election and failure to observe those laws should be addressable once the intent to violate the laws is well-established.
Elections.... lol. We save selections in this country. And fraud.
Free men here have voting and guns to protect our freedom. They stole the first one, next year they’ll take the guns just as easily
Its the State of GA legislature who has to be the Plaintiff. If they won’t sign on, its dead in the water. Its their specific constitutional rights that have been violated..not any candidate’ s or your’s
They should be aware of it, but Loeffler and Perdue seem to be a little slow on the uptake. I’ve heard Lin Wood mention this about only voters from the general election being allowed to vote in the runoff, so I assume it’s in his pending lawsuit. But, of course, the GA legislature seems totally incompetent and/or unwilling to challenge anything, even though it’s their authority being usurped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.