Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fury

So any President May issue an EO that acts as law, and allows himself the power to declare martial law.

Read that sentence aloud.

Then explain to me how that doesn’t sound like some Central European dictatorship double talk.

Trump could declare what he wants, but don’t be shocked when everyone leaves him standing there when he barks his orders.


44 posted on 12/13/2020 12:38:54 PM PST by Vermont Lt (We have entered "Insanity Week." Act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

Re: 44 - Agreed.

Martial law of any degree related to the 2020 election is not going to be invoked. No matter how much some on FR want that to happen.


45 posted on 12/13/2020 12:44:35 PM PST by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt
But he could utilize the Insurrection Act, which is US Law, not "some Central European dictatorship double talk."

If the courts, legislatures and the DOJ are not going to stop this injustice, Trump can use the Insurrection Act, which has has been retitled for the 21st century as "The Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act” and codified in four sections of the US Code:

10 USC § 251, Federal Aid for State Governments

10 USC § 252, Use of Militia and Armed Forces to Enforce Federal Authority

10 USC § 253, Interference with State and Federal Law

10 USC § 254, Proclamation to Disperse

Of the four provisions, the most recent and the most powerful is 10 USC § 253, which was written in 2006.

It reads in part ".... The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it-

1. .... so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection;

or 2. .... opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws."....

The authority is vested solely in the President. He does not need the invitation of state governors to intervene, nor does he need the approval of the Supreme Court. Older provisions of the Insurrection Act required either a governor or a judicial proceeding to authorize its use, but these limits were purposefully removed by Congress in § 253.

There is no time limit on the President’s activities. Older versions of the Insurrection Act limited the use of force to brief periods of time and then required legislative approval. Those limits, too, are also gone. The President is allowed to use any means that he (and again, he needs no one else) considers necessary. This includes using the armed forces (which enables him to bypass the Posse Comitatus Act) and using the militia which is detailed in 10 USC § 252 " Use of Militia and Armed Forces to Enforce Federal Authority."

The President’s ability to use force isn’t restricted to actual rebellion or insurgency. He can act against merely unlawful combinations and conspiracies. To be clear: If the President decides that a conspiracy has deprived people of a right and believes that authorities fail or refuse to protect the right, he can send in the troops.

52 posted on 12/13/2020 1:17:28 PM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson