[Dr. Franklin]

Trump was short-changed by his legal team. The salient point in my mind is not the "arguing" so m uch as overlooking key legal issues that would have forced the recalcitrant USSC to examine anything other than "standing."

I disagree. Let me gently suggest that they filed many lawsuits by people other than the candidate and his electors, (who have better standing), to probe where to file their better cases. Trying to get the right judge to hear the case at the trial level is of great importance, since a hostile judge can just choose not to believe the facts of the fraud and torpedo the case. Some of these cases have also produced evidence that can be used either in subsequent cases, the state legislatures, or the joint session of Congress in January that decides which electors to accept or reject.

[Liz]

The case is huge and convoluted thanks to the chaos visited on the election by power-hungry Dems ......
........I dont disagree with your take for those reasons.