Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After U.S. Supreme Court Rejected Texas Lawsuit, Will Trump Use His Rumored “2018 Executive Order Plan” To Retain The Presidency?
Red State Nation ^ | 12.12.2020 | Sarah Hall

Posted on 12/12/2020 7:39:15 AM PST by USA Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: Liz

Isn’t is funny how Republicans never have standing in anything?


81 posted on 12/12/2020 9:59:35 AM PST by D Rider ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Agreed, but IF Biden gets in, my thoughts are there will not be anything left of America to qualify as a prize. Research Argentina and their long road down the toilet...it began with a socialist government elected after they had a currency crisis....do note the USD has spiraled down to 89-90 range and heading lower. That said, I still maintain somehow Trump will prevail.


82 posted on 12/12/2020 10:39:33 AM PST by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin
The case is huge and convoluted thanks to the chaos visited on the election by power-hungry Dems ......
........I dont disagree with your take for those reasons.
83 posted on 12/12/2020 11:42:35 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Hate to break it to you, Battman, but more stuff will happen after Monday......


84 posted on 12/12/2020 12:37:48 PM PST by RedMominBlueState
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

we denied Obama a supreme court nominee for nearly a YEAR!


85 posted on 12/12/2020 1:26:26 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: philippa

“Trump said he would concede if the electors voted for Biden.”

As I’ve pointed out earlier, those were not HIS words. Those words were in a question he was asked.

He replied, “Certainly I will... but there will be a lot of things happening between now and the 20th” of January.

In other words, he was referring to the ENTIRE process of certifying, voting, transmitting, counting, objecting, etc.

The fight for retaining this office is not over until January 20. And if it does come to a vote in the House (one vote per state) and this duty is not fulfilled by March 4, the Vice President (elect) would assume the presidency. Since these are decided simultaneously, the only point here is that the inclusion of this date implies the current president stays in office until the issue is resolved, even AFTER January 20.

The problem is that, short of open war, there are not many remedies to election fraud if the electoral votes are not disqualified by January 20. Since there is a remedy provided to Congress, I am doubtful the Supreme Court would move to decertify any electoral votes certified and transmitted by the states.

If I was Mike Pence and very brave, I’d add a step between the opening and counting of votes by shredding and burning the ones where open fraud has been proven. Then I’d defy anyone to do anything about it.

It’s not over now. It won’t be over Monday. Regardless of who is sworn in on January 20 (assuming this happens), there will be war.

In my opinion, the best outcome will require calling in the troops before January 20, under Marshall law.


86 posted on 12/12/2020 2:00:31 PM PST by unlearner (Be ready for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

Thanks for your answer, I feel better. If Trump isn’t giving up, neither will we.


87 posted on 12/12/2020 2:43:05 PM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker
California could select all Democrat electors, or assign them by lottery, or select them anyway they want, Texas or any other state has no say in it, none.

That would be fine as long as it was the California Legislature that wrote the rules. But that's not what happened here. It's a slam-dunk that state governors and state judges changed the rules for conducting the election without legislative approval and that puts it in violation of Article II of the Constitution.

88 posted on 12/12/2020 4:11:48 PM PST by libertylover (Remember: Deep State hated Jesus too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
In my opinion, the best outcome will require calling in the troops before January 20, under Marshall law.

Thankfully, that won't occur.

89 posted on 12/12/2020 4:13:42 PM PST by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: USA Conservative

Bttt!


90 posted on 12/12/2020 5:21:46 PM PST by Pagey (Valerie Jarrett. She IS STILL in DC, Creating More Havoc for President Trump. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

In-part based on statements made by Democrats prior. One of those cases where one’s statements can come back to bite.

That being said - overall, the Senate was pretty generous to Obama with his appointees (far more so than the Dem-controlled period during the GW Bush time - though as we see by Roberts, it might have been a blessing).


91 posted on 12/13/2020 12:05:16 PM PST by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson