Obviously we had restraint when Kyle Rittenhouse got prosecuted, because it was elections, but now that they cheated, what is the use of restraint at this point?
No, only force will do now, and with terroristic statements like these, it lends even more credence to the fact that no more lowering our rules of engagements with low level of acceptable risk,
When an antifa thug all of a sudden backs away because someone has a gun and they act like a victim, this right there is proof of terrorism and the wish to disarm to lower rules of engagement in order to murder the submitted.
We can play this game too. If they want a stand off, we can play this game. Ow when a Rittenhouse is hailed, we are beyond Trump and some pipe dream of 2024 elections. Now use of force will be needed if we truly want to keep our ROEs.
Do not disarm and default to lower your ROEs.
One of the hardest and most basic decision is the answer to that age old question - “7.62 or 5.56?”
Don't think her “soldiers” are going to like the answer, regardless. It's a question with no wrong answers.
She wants us to know she and her minions are coming for us.
Well, the below video may be a bit off topic and it's kind of NSFW and not always in the best of taste, her from but it does sort of capture the zeitgeist of a lot of deplorables out there.
If Veterans Were In Horror Movies 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjk7QVMMgZs
A very public visit to the nice lady by the Secret Service would go a long way towards preventing a big mistake.