[cowboyusa]

The Court is not going to overturn the election, but I want mail in balloting curbed going forward.

[NELSON111]

No - they are not. However - a lot of people here think they are. They are mistaken.

[White Lives Matter]

(The Court is not going to overturn the election)

They’ve got to fix this mess!

[knarf]

On what are you basing your opinion ?

The SC will be forced to hear the argument that Pa unConstitutionally over rode it's own Constitution

[hopespringseternal]

If that is the case, then the court is basically setting up a fraud free-for-all where elections will always be decided by the biggest cheat.

Doing so pretty much guarantees an outlet for political expression for states outside the normal political/electoral processes. A handful of cities just made themselves the rulers of a nation of 300 million. The election was overthrown between 11pm and 3am election night.

The last time this happened was 1876, and they were smart enough to know they could not let it stand.

[ought-six]

“The Court is not going to overturn the election, but I want mail in balloting curbed going forward.”

I agree. But I will go one step further: I want mail-in balloting rendered illegal.

[DesertRhino]

There is no election to “overturn”. Only a fraud proclaimed as won by the fraudsters and the media.

[ZULU]

Sure. And the people who are trying to seize control of this election are going to do just that should they profit from the system. (Sarcasm).

If they win, its over. As simple as that
Elections will no longer have any meaning as the courts refuse to assure their integrity and we no longer a Republic.

[Free Louie]

I dont see how Making a judgement whereby the absentee ballots are deemed invalid would be even tantamount to SCOTUS overturning an election. The court would not be speaking of the remaining legal ballots if they were to decide the absentee ballots as they stood violated the constitution . It would simply be, that since the remaining constitutionally legal votes were not enough for Biden to declare victory, that trump would be the victor in the state of Pennsylvania et al... The “outcome” would be a simple case of math — not a direct “change of the outcome” on the part of SCOTUS.