I’m assuming that the headline is erroneous. The Pennsylvania lawsuit was filed by Cong. Mike Kelly and two congressional candidates that “lost” because of a massive influx of mail-in ballots, which were authorized by the governor, the secretary of state and the state supreme court without consulting with the legislature - a direct violation of the state and US constitutions.
This is compelling because of the nature of the Pennsylvania lawsuit, which is not fraud-based (i.e., requiring the presentation of evidence), but an issue of constitutionality. Judges, by nature, are reluctant to be the deciding factor in anything that sets precedent or might be contentious. If the Pennsylvania lawsuit is supported by multiple other states, it’s far more likely to get the attention of SCOTUS.
I would add that the lawsuit filed by the State of Texas against Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan could end up being a very big deal as well.
“Judges, by nature, are reluctant to be the deciding factor in anything that sets precedent or might be contentious”
Except for all Obama appointed judges and RINO Bush judges that all hate everything that President Trump wants to do...