Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
ONLY a sample was hand counted. So only mirrored the initial counting, not exposing anything. It was raffie’s scam.

Can we PLEASE get our facts right? The facts are that only a sample was REQUIRED to be hand counted, but Raffensperger ordered that the sample was to be 100% of the ballots, thus ALL paper ballots were hand counted. Every one of them. That was Raffensperger's decision after Garland Favorito urged him to do a 100% hand count. Of course no one is ever satisfied in this, but Raffensperger did us a great favor in having all the paper ballots hand counted. If there had been massive electronic fraud, the election would already have been overturned. But instead, we have people like you who have convinced themselves that we didn't do a 100% hand count in Georgia and use the "risk limited audit" specifications to suggest that. Again, Raffensperger ordered a 100% hand recount instead of a statistical sample.

84 posted on 12/04/2020 10:07:06 AM PST by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Religion and Politics

Your usual disinformation post. The entire state was not recounted. The recount was held in Atlanta, not state-wide.


85 posted on 12/04/2020 10:12:48 AM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson