The other side is going to say that we hacked into the machine and did this.
Also, was the machine secure?
They need to now access other machines, and do so forensically, and see if the votes were altered.
Personally, I don’t see how they can prove this.
Also, why is it always and only GP that finds this stuff?
True that GP is a click bait site to me. Can’t speak to what others think.
There was a lawyer in the GA Meeting who went thru a detailed list
of different categories of fraud based on GA Voter Registration.
It was not speculation but based on fact. Such as underage voters.
Non residential voters, dead voters, etc. they all added up to more
than enough to give Trump GA. These numbers were based on GA
Voter Registration information. In other words FACTS.
Whenever I see a headline like this, I just assume it’s GP.
And I’m right about, oh...100% of the time.
They’re either the only media outlet investigating and reporting on the actual fraud that took place, or they’ve hired on staff from The Weekly World News.
I choose to believe the former, and that’s pretty scary.
“The other side is going to say that we hacked into the machine and did this.”
Which is then an admission that the machines can be hacked.
GP isn't typically the original source of the information. But they do publish material faster than most other news organizations, and they aren't intentionally holding back on stories.
Sometimes GP is wrong, and their headlines tend to be exaggerated like most headlines today. But they are paying attention to information uncovered by a lot of sources that usually get ignored.
A lot of information gets posted first on Twitter, or TheDonald.win, or gets surfaced by anons on one of the chans.