The claimed risk isn't QR code flipping, it is flipping or dropping of races before generating the ballot. The difference of about 12,000 votes in just under 5 million total ballots is a small percentage. I don't have time to run down the percentage that were absentee ballots, but it is possible that the 12,000 vote difference is less than 1% of the number of ballots cast using the in person Dominion machines.
In that situation you would not expect to see many people reporting an incorrect ballot. If the code switched one vote for every 100 voters, and 10% of voters validated their ballot then in many polling places no one would detect the swap.
BTW, I'm just repeating the arguments Democrats made a couple of months ago. Apparently they have forgotten that now.
In that situation you would not expect to see many people reporting an incorrect ballot. If the code switched one vote for every 100 voters, and 10% of voters validated their ballot then in many polling places no one would detect the swap.
BTW, I'm just repeating the arguments Democrats made a couple of months ago. Apparently they have forgotten that now.
We will have to study what they came up with in Ware County I guess. My impression is that it was a voting machine(s) that did the vote swap when printing the ballot. There has been issues in setup where a particular "pattern" of selections has resulted in the QR code being printed and not being accurate (vote switching). You might remember that the software in one county had to be updated just before the election to fix a problem in a local down ballot race found like this in testing.