Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

But there is no way to find these illegal ballots and remove them from the count, thanks to the secret ballot law. The ONLY recourse is to nullify the entire election, and that’s the longest of longshots.

It is time for mail-in ballot reform in which if you choose to mail in a ballot, you forfeit your right for a secret ballot. If you vote in person, with ID, then you can cast your ballot secretly.


4 posted on 12/03/2020 6:54:35 AM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo
It is time for mail-in ballot reform in which if you choose to mail in a ballot, you forfeit your right for a secret ballot. If you vote in person, with ID, then you can cast your ballot secretly.

Other than those who are out of state on Election Day or otherwise cannot physically get to the polls, end all mail-in voting. If cannot get off your butt to go to the polls and vote then tough; by your own actions you have squandered your right to vote.

6 posted on 12/03/2020 6:59:54 AM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Every vote must count or so they tell us, but every legal vote was diluted by fraud.

This is good stuff - the kind of stuff that will bring results now vs after the electoral college IF the Georgia Legislature will act, but I don’t see much from them.


8 posted on 12/03/2020 7:02:50 AM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Yes, the secret ballot requirement is taken advantage of by those who rig elections. A 2004 WA State court case Rossi vs. Gregoire proved illegal voter ballots more than a 1000% to change the outcome but the Democrat Judge could not rule because it impossible to divine the voter’s intention even though it was known the illegal ballots were gathered by Democrat operatives.

One key to nullification is to establish violations of equal protections before SCOTUS. The clause provides “nor shall any State... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” This applies to groups of voters There are many examples, if Republican poll watchers were restricted, if machines are found with material discrepancies in at least one, if required audits are denied or not proper, and so on.

If a cogent, focused, impactful case can get before SCOTUS, the Justices will have to deliberate whether election outcomes were determined from results that violated equal protections, and if they affirm, the Electors in affected states may not be seated. If neither Biden nor Trump achieve 270 Electors, the Constitution requires a majority of 50 state delegations in the House of Representatives to determine the President-Elect.

The PA lawsuit before SCOTUS is joined by a new lawsuit from Wisconsin, both include questions of equal protections.


19 posted on 12/03/2020 10:03:50 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson