Posted on 12/02/2020 10:01:07 AM PST by re_tail20
We need a National Standard with Rules and Checks for all Federal Elections. Leaving Elections to local and State Politicians is an invitation to Cheating and Fraud.
The Ca ‘State’ welfare board gave away
400 million dollars to prisoners.
That Stolen Election tho
Who can ever again believe in voting?
Finally - what I think is best. ... Wisconsin
—
Not working out too well here, perhaps have another go at the drawing board.
Uniform, national solutions to problems is the Democrat way of doing things. I get suspicious whenever I hear of a solution where “one size fits all”.
One of the best things that President Trump did this year was to leave the handling of COVID-19 to the individual states. Because, despite socialist protestations to the contrary, one size does not fit all.
That’s nothing. The Washington state director of Unemployment Department gave away 576 million dollars and they no not where. In fact, the State auditor is a Democrat and Inslee, etal, are stalling and ignoring the report.
Here in criminal CT the Democrats steal everything in sight, including elections.
You can’t fix a pure kleptocracy with additional layers of kleptocrats.
So we will have government employees monitoring government actions? I think not. How about a random selection of citizens, like jury duty, chosen at random, to monitor every ballot counting station, that report their findings to a master group of random selected citizens. Like a grand jury, this body will have the power to issue subpoenas, and issue arrest warrants, if it seems necessary. Charges then go to the attorney general. If no action from the attorney general, it then goes federal.
This would just result in corrupt state election boards. We have plenty of safeguards in place but politicized state and local actors are just ignoring them with no consequences.
Cause adding another layer of appointed bureaucrats fixes everything.
“We need a National Standard with Rules and Checks for all Federal Elections.”
I agree. This is one of the few times I prefer to see Federal standards and oversight.
That would be unconstitutional. 10th amendment and all that.
We have to decide where we want “states rights” and where we don’t.
I am sometimes surprised at the number of people advocating federal expansion.
Why just 50? Why not all 57 states?
The only reason that the cheating got caught in this election was that the diversity of elections systems created such enormous complexity that COORDINATING the cheating became an inherently complex undertaking...
If you had a centralized system... you’d get the cheating being done from the top down with no one the wiser.
What we need is for every state to be SO different... that there cannot be any centralized coordination to steal an election... without it being made obvious... as it was in this election... in ONLY A FEW STATES.
We need it to be made obvious in EVERY state... including by having every state be unique in its processes...
I don’t know that we need to change.
But we need a set of minimal standards for federal elections with federal penalties for failure to adhere to them.
And we need federal oversight of certain problem districtsl. We don’t want Feds in charge of the entire elections everywhere. That’s too much concentrated power. But problem sites need additional oversight.
Things like refusing one party’s poll watchers, having one poll watcher for 16 tables, or processing ballots in the absence of the poll watchers should never happen and there should be prosecutions when they do.
Voting districts with allegations of voter fraud, should have additional oversight. And Federal marshalls on standby in case poll watchers are refused.
Most "democratic" countries are about the population of a large U.S. State.
We already have it. Read the US Constitution, especially about elections. It advances a political mechanism as opposed to a criminal one. The state Legislatures communicate the election choice of electors through them, so that if the election is UNLAWFUL they can choose an alternate set of electors themselves, or reward the candidates who didn't cheat with the choice of their electors. Or they can come up with their own electors. If no electors are presented, then the Electoral College shrinks by that state's number of EV (Electoral Votes). If states want to be represented in Presidential elections, they better elect Secretaries of State who can produce LAWFUL elections. hint- "LAWFUL" and "UNLAWFUL" are the correct political terms for the special relationship between states legislatures and the US Constitution in federal elections.
The constitution says the states can use whatever process they wish to determine their electors.
However, if they delegate the selection process to an election, the election must conform to all elements of the extended constitution (Amendments too).
The 12th and 14th amendments are most relevant.
A federally mandated process would be unconstitutional because it is STATES that elect a president, NOT the citizenry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.