She’s on Hannity’s radio show now, hopefully she will discuss.
She just ended her interview with Hannity. He asked her do you have names of witnesses who can attest to Dominion voter fraud. She refused to answer. Hannity then asked why hasn’t evidence been turned over the court. She said she’s having problems getting access to the Dominion machines. Then Hannity asked her if these people have signed sworn affidavits to attest that they were used to commit fraud. Her answer: “No, I was only told that”
This tells me she has zero evidence and she’s only beIN told. In essence, hearsay!
“She’s on Hannity’s radio show now, hopefully she will discuss.”
I just heard that. Most hosts interview guests. Hannity interrupts guests.
First off, Hannity seemed to be obsessed with General Flynn’s pardon, etc. That subject is obnoxious, it is over, there are more pressing issues now Powell is managing.
When Powell said experts testified that data from Dominion went to Germany, Hannity asked: “But do we have evidence of that?”
He can’t understand that before an expert can testify that data from Dominion went to Germany, they have to have evidence of it.
When Powell said some witnesses were getting death threats, and some were already in the hospital as a result of their testimony, Hannity seemed completely uninterested in that. He wanted their names. It can’t be evidence until he says it is evidence.