The party of registration is a rabbit hole. Waste of time to try and make claims based on that.
It’s pretty simple to get the names of the people those military ballots in that county were issued to and ask them who they voted for. Some of them will be willing to say so under oath, either way. And that assumes that military ballots are in no way distinct from regular ballots and thus cannot be separated. If they can be separated it is even easier.
Some states sign people up with a specified party preference... some don’t.
Georgia doesn’t...
But, it is an issue, still, that one of the companies directly associated with the problematic conduct of the computerized voting aspect of the election is the SAME company that has the contract to facilitate military absentee voting...
In prior posting I’d noted that awareness of that linkage required checking on the military vote to make sure those votes weren’t being switched, since they were so close to the core of the fraud.
This line in the filing says they DID check on the military vote... at least in this one instance. But if all they did was check the LOCAL total... as Georgia tracks those votes separately... but they DIDN’T check the military votes everywhere to see how they leaned ?
Seeing all 900 in one area voting Biden ? Could mean that every single military voter that used the electronic system and voted for Trump had their vote switched... with that being done BEFORE the vote left the electronic system to be transmitted to the state or local officials to be counted.