Indeed that’s the real question. We can safely assume that the hacks on PASC will rule that Act 77 is constitutional. Would the SCOTUS take up an appeal when the PASC ruling would be so clearly corrupt?
“Would the SCOTUS take up an appeal when the PASC ruling would be so clearly corrupt?”
I sure am happy that the big issue during Amy Coney Barrett’s hearings was about original meaning of the law or constitution, not legislating from the bench.
State constitution, unless ammended, overrules state legislation. Period. Any ruling by the PA Supreme Court inconsistant with the PA constitution is illegal.