[usnavy_cop_retired]

Agree with your assessment. The remedies are fairly easy: Disqualify all mail in votes not requested through the absentee ballot request system, (since it is impossible to determine who they voted for or to identify the specific votes, an amount which represents the percentage split of in-person votes should be removed for each candidate). Assume that the in-person votes split 55-45% for PDJT then the illegal votes will be removed from the total count accordingly. The legal in-person votes and absentee votes will not be affected by removing the illegal votes by the formula I suggest and it may be possible to isolate the absentee votes to determine the exact percentage they represented for each candidate.

[Dr. Franklin]

The remedies are fairly easy

They are easy for us, but drastic for the judges. Remember that in Bush v. Gore in 2000, SCOTUS ruled 7-2 that Florida violated the equal protection clause in how it conducted the recount, but split sharply 5-4 on the remedy of stopping the recount. I don't know if they can distinguish the novel mail in ballots from the absentee ballots.

By comingling all of the ballots they made a mess of things. To use a crude analogy, if someone urinates in to a vat of wine, do you bottle up the wine like nothing happened because so much money and effort went in to making the wine? It's what they did. Once the courts get past the standing arguments and other excuses, and actually address the fraud, the issue then becomes the remedy. Tossing out hundreds of thousands of illegal or fraudulent ballots leads to the cannard that the courts are disenfranchising voters. In fact those ballots are cancelling out legal votes. It's the ultimate cancel culture!