Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone

This judge made it clear, at least to me, that the case before her is solid and that the expansion of mail in voting is unconstitutional. The relief here seems tricky because there was obviously those who voted absentee legally, so how would those voters not be disenfranchised by their vote being disregarded too. Seems from what I understand of the composition of the PA SC, this judge’s injunction will be overturned and this will end up in USSC. Don’t see how any strict constitutionalist could interpret the PA requirements for absentee voting or how those requirements can be amended any other way than what they plainly say. How then and what relief. Wowsers


32 posted on 11/27/2020 9:19:21 PM PST by armyofprinciples (something's amiss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: armyofprinciples
Don’t see how any strict constitutionalist could interpret the PA requirements for absentee voting or how those requirements can be amended any other way than what they plainly say. How then and what relief. Bowsers

Yup. The USSC will find this unconstitutional and it will tell the PA legislature to do its constitutional duty and remedy the situation.

38 posted on 11/27/2020 9:59:38 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson