]So that’s enough for you, huh. No real interest in this case, then.]
I’m interested in outcomes, not process. When people say they’re interested in the new model Corvette about to come out, they don’t generally mean they want to know how it’s designed or assembled. They just want to look at it when it rolls off the assembly line and maybe buy it, if it’s all the marketing department has made it out to be. In Powell’s case, she’s got a long history of issuing PR fluff with a thin record of success at trial to back up the most colorful claims. People like F. Lee Bailey or Johnny Cochrane did not have to say *anything* resembling hype - their win-loss records preceded them, and gave them instant credibility.
I’m interested in outcomes, not process. Understandable. But you are involved, as a critic of her in this case. And public opinions can persuade outcomes. Exactly how, and how much, is not easily discernable. But it is not dismissible, either.