To: CurlyDave; MayflowerMadam
Totally agreed with you both. Strong, distinct flavor of corruption --- probably blatant violation of the spirit of the law --- and I think helps any court that needs to make a decision, especially civil cases with preponderance of evidence.
But also curious and interested in whether there is any explicit legal/statutory violation.
65 posted on
11/26/2020 4:31:07 AM PST by
tinyowl
(A is A)
To: tinyowl
“curious and interested in whether there is any explicit legal/statutory violation.”
Where I’ve worked, this clearly was stipulated in a section of City Ordinance/Code. Not sure about state, but how could it not be? Otherwise it invites fraud at the top.
67 posted on
11/26/2020 5:12:34 AM PST by
MayflowerMadam
("FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING." Landmark case - SCOTUS/ U.S. v. Throckmorton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson