[Ronin]

I am very suspicious as well. There seems to be a concentrated effort to shift the narrative from “it was stolen by voter fraud” to “it was stolen, alright, but gosh-darn-it, it was stolen in ways that are not criminal and can’t be prosecuted, so we’ll just have to suck-it-up and do better next time.”

Tucker’s narrative was much like that, from what I hear. I haven’t seen the tape.

[JoSixChip]

Tucker’s narrative was much like that, from what I hear.

It was, and I do not understand why Trump tweeted it.

[thecodont]

I am very suspicious as well. There seems to be a concentrated effort to shift the narrative from “it was stolen by voter fraud” to “it was stolen, alright, but gosh-darn-it, it was stolen in ways that are not criminal and can’t be prosecuted, so we’ll just have to suck-it-up and do better next time.”

I was thinking of that quote, "First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win," applied to this instance. You'll see the narrative shift, from stories about voter and election fraud being ignored, then to these stories being ridiculed, then to them being admitted to with qualifications ("but you can't LEGALLY prove it so you have no case" "not material" "not ripe" "no standing" etc.), then on to battle.