I agree - there appears to be massive evidence in the data itself..
What I continue to wonder is why Sidney (or others) have not already been IN COURT presenting that data for a judge to review?
Puzzling..
Accusing the GA Gov and SOS of all manner of things, though, with apparently nothing firm to back it up is likely what got her tossed.
But what is the venue for presenting this fraud data? Perhaps that explains the delay in presenting this data. The crime seems to be one of a federal infraction and I’m not sure this data could be presented in a case at the state level.
I don’t have a firm grasp of how this election litigation is managed and what courts can correctly address this level of fraud...
But it appears to me that Powell is looking for the right conditions to bring forth the detailed aspects of the case - I suspect this will need to happen in a federal court.
Well, legal rules don’t always allow for the immediate introduction of statistical evidence. Court rules and procedures aren’t always straight forward...you need a reason, a basis on which to introduce certain testimony.
It STARTS with affidavits and may eventually lead to/incorporate testimony from an expert on statistical & mathematical analysis.