Posted on 11/21/2020 12:12:14 PM PST by Kaslin
Good grief. She doesn’t work for Tucker or Faux. She owes them nothing. She is working a case for her client and hasn’t presented it yet. She would be guilty of gross negligence to give them her evidence BEFORE SHE USES IT ON BEHALF OF HER CLIENT.
I would also note that the way Tucker characterized Ms. Powell strongly implied she was lying about what they have.
(Doesn’t matter, I watch NewsMax now anyway).
I know. Isn’t it a great news program. Its young but it has great potential.
Grow a pair of what?
Carson is a fraud. FOX news is a shrill for the neo-con’s.
And he has no problem staying with them.
Agreed! Amazing what you have to overlook to think Biden won. He won more votes then Obama and didn’t even campaign!
Ballot curing in Democrat counties near Philadelphia and Pittsburgh but not in Republicans is acceptable to you? Taking mail-in ballots after 8 p.m. on Election Day in violation of state legislature is, too?
How do you know the affidavits did prove anything? Do you read them?
I assume there will be multiple lawsuits in PA and appeals potentially all the way to SCOTUS.
Testicles unless you're a woman. Then, you should grow a spine.
Provide us a source for that.
Are you telling us that you don't believe voter fraud cost Trump the election?
“What is wrong with demanding evidence?”
Evidence is designed to be brought up in court, not to satisfy the spastic clown peanut gallery on FR.
“It’s really unfair for a lawyer to say she’s “not trying this case in the court of public opinion” ... while she’s doing a TV interview whose sole purpose is to broadcast her side of the case to millions of people in a TV audience.”
You’re smarter than that, Alberta. This is a very public case and she’s preparing that public for what’s coming.
“On Thursday evening, he criticized Trump lawyer Sidney Powell for not providing evidence for some of the claims she has made “
We all know that lawyers give their evidence to talking heads on TV before the give it to a court. /s
TUCK FUC..... oops, that doesn’t work in this case!
SCREW TUCKER and everyone else on Fox News.
DTM (DEAD to Me)
Are you sure about Tucker being heir to a fortune? His Dad was a CIA agent when Bush Sr was president. Why would his dad be a CIA agent if he had a fortune through his family or his wife?
Dad:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Carlson
Stepmom — almost nothing findable by searching, so a clip from above link:
“In 1979, Carlson married divorcée Patricia Caroline Swanson, an heiress to the Swanson frozen-food fortune. Swanson is the daughter of Gilbert Carl Swanson, and the niece of Senator J. William Fulbright.[26][27] This was the third marriage for Swanson, who legally adopted Tucker Carlson and his brother.[28][27]”
An article about Tucker:
https://www.heraldweekly.com/a-sneak-peek-into-the-life-of-tucker-carlson/
Search is harrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd...
Actually, I could care less about him. I never watched him. I thought there was something strange about him. And with his background there is something not quite right with him. He fits perfect with FN’s. Another network, I never watch.
Appears we’re both wasting our time with this con man.
“Appears we’re both wasting our time with this con man.”
I never trusted Tucker. Gut feel. But, he has a big FReeper Fan Club. So did Sessions and GWB and Rove and...
Quoted here:
[Judge] Brann: Well let me ask you then, are you arguing strict scrutiny should apply here?
Giuliani: No, the normal scrutiny should apply. If we had alleged fraud, yes. But this is not a fraud case.
Okay. So what specifically was the issue Rudy was addressing? Was the double standard in regard to ballot curing? That issues doesn’t pertain to voter fraud. The problem in that case was unequal application of election laws. Was he referring to mail-in ballots being received after 8 p.m. on election day? That issue doesn’t pertain to voter fraud. That issue is about whether the state Supreme Court violated the constitution in extending the deadline past 8 p.m. on election night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.