There are many other possibilities, any of which would be considered 'Kraken' level evidence.
witness who decided to tell the truth..facing large prison sentenes..its called cracking egga...one breaks and soon the whole dozen is busted
It really isn’t that simple. It may actually be that this data manipulation is not happening in the ballot counters themselves. That’s why the servers that communicate with these counters need to be investigated. And that’s why is is alarming to hear that the counts are getting sent around the world to be “processed”. I would presume that the software in the counters is very simplistic and may not provide the proof you request. The adjustments could be orchestrated from outside the ballot counter.
At least that is what I would do if I did the design. I wouldn’t want any trail of the malfeasance by allowing someone to inspect the machine or software.