Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Tucker, That's Not How This Works; Sidney Powell is under less-than-zero obligation to come on your show and tell you anything
Red State ^ | 11/20/2020 | Scott Hounsell

Posted on 11/20/2020 8:31:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: El Cid

Re: is witness testimony not considered evidence?

What crime has been alleged?

Until Sydney Powell files a specific criminal complaint against a specific person or entity, “witness” testimony is just a bunch of people talking.

Has Powell filed a specific complaint?

Not that I am aware of.

If she has, I will immediately retract and apologize.


21 posted on 11/20/2020 9:29:21 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll go with what others are pointing out. Powell’s job is to gather evidence and present it in court. It is not her job to appear on Carlson’s show to pump up his ratings, nor to compromise the identify of witnesses and the content of their testimony before a court hearing takes place. Now if Tucker isn’t happy with that, he should be pressuring his bosses to hire competent investigative journalists to report back to him. Let’s see what THEY come up with Tucker!


22 posted on 11/20/2020 9:29:26 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
On what other news program could she expect a more-impartial hearing?

On one where the host does not say "I don't care that my company has come out openly as siding with evil as long as their checks cash."

23 posted on 11/20/2020 9:29:47 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (And lead us not into hysteria, but deliver us from the handwashers. Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
2) when it came to the statistics and math behind the irregular data coming out of the voting machines, she said that since she is not a numbers person, she offered to bring a math/data expert with her to present their evidence.

I found Mr. Carlson's characterization of Ms. Powell's response ("she got angry") a little too pat and lacking in detail. If she did indeed offer to come on the show (whether or not with a "math expert" in tow), then Mr. Carlson's statements (that she "refused") were, indeed, misleading.

Regards,

24 posted on 11/20/2020 9:42:59 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
On one where the host does not say "I don't care that [...]

Be concrete! Powell knows that millions of Americans are distraught about this. Please state the name of one reputable news show on which she could expect a more-impartial hearing.

Regards,

25 posted on 11/20/2020 9:45:12 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: El Cid
"I'm not a legal beagle, but I thought signed affidavits were considered evidence."

I believe that the affidavits that have been released refer to other aspects of the fraud, not the alleged tampering with the voting machines.

I also believe Carlson is getting a bad rap about this. He accepted those aspects of the case for which evidence has been provided, and said that he was waiting for evidence on the charges that the voting machines were manipulated. It is an enormous claim that millions of votes were switched, and it can't be accepted merely on faith.

Tonight he was conciliatory - he didn't lash back at Powell - and said he is willing to wait for the evidence.

It makes me mad how quickly some people write off one of the best defenders of conservativism that we have because they didn't like one aspect of one show. That is childish; it is as snow-flakey as anything on the left.
26 posted on 11/20/2020 9:50:23 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
(No, sworn statements are not evidence, so get that crap out of here)

They're not??? Ohhhkayyy. Then why are they taken and why are people faced with jail time if those statements are proven false?

Also, a hundred thousand votes that are dumped at 4 o'clock in the morning for one candidate with no explanation as to where they came from isn't evidence of fraudulent activity?

I guess if Tucker Carlson saw a $100,000 purchase on his credit card statement that he didn't authorize he'd just shrug his shoulders and go, "Huh. That's weird. Ah, well. I have no evidence as to what happened or who did it so I'll just suck it up and pay it."

27 posted on 11/20/2020 9:51:29 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
"On one where the host does not say "I don't care that my company has come out openly as siding with evil as long as their checks cash."

He never said any such thing, and you know it. If you are willing to lie like that, join the Democrats.
28 posted on 11/20/2020 9:53:07 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Huckabee.

Sorry but drag a dollar bill through a TV studio and Tucker will follow it.

And Tucker is an opinion show, not a news show.

29 posted on 11/20/2020 9:55:30 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (And lead us not into hysteria, but deliver us from the handwashers. Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Sydney is under NO obligation to present evidence ANYWHERE but in court, why in the hell would she EVER give evidence to the press!!


30 posted on 11/20/2020 9:55:47 PM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
I paraphrased but that is what he said when he said that he was sticking with Fox despite the fact they had tap-danced all over their credibility.

I am sorry that reality offends you. Maybe you should go join the democrats as they have the same problem.

31 posted on 11/20/2020 9:58:23 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (And lead us not into hysteria, but deliver us from the handwashers. Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

I’m also on Tucker’s side. She took the time to appear with Lou Dobbs and Maria Baritomo, both fine Conservatives with good credentials and shows that have a miniscule audience compared to TC. It would be like skipping Rush Limbaugh to be on the Bill Bennett podcast and it did make her look like she was trying to avoid something besides tough questions from an interviewer. Plus, if she thinks TC is rude how is she going to handle Dem lawyers looking to tear her evidence to pieces? It was just bad optics.


32 posted on 11/20/2020 10:24:52 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dp0622; bray; BEJ; Enterprise; GreatRoad; Travis McGee

33 posted on 11/20/2020 10:28:15 PM PST by 4Liberty (How does a kids car-donation nonprofit pay for so MANY radio ads if it's a charity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
‘B-b-but muh kids private school is expensive!!!’ - TC
34 posted on 11/20/2020 10:31:34 PM PST by 4Liberty (How does a kids car-donation nonprofit pay for so MANY radio ads if it's a charity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Still not sure who Sidney Powell is? Don’t think she has the goods on these election stealing scum? The first few paragraphs will answer both concerns but I urge you to read it all. This is a truly remarkable woman and we and America are lucky to have her on the right side.
https://stream.org/i-know-sidney-powell-she-is-telling-the-truth/


35 posted on 11/20/2020 10:40:53 PM PST by Dick Bachert (THE DEEP STATE HATES US! IT DETESTS TRUMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

Biden’s reset.


36 posted on 11/20/2020 10:55:42 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
This is the interview Tucker wanted. Howie Carr got it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POWLUS16xbA&t=53s


37 posted on 11/20/2020 11:00:58 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Thanks for the link. I used to live in NH and listened to Howie Carr every day. I also used to read his columns in the Boston Herald. I loved it when he slammed the bow-tied bumkissers from Morrisey Boulevard. He also introduced me to the word Bindelstiff, a great description of modern day politicians.


38 posted on 11/20/2020 11:12:17 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt
Re: 13

Thanks

39 posted on 11/20/2020 11:13:46 PM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Well educated, well worded highly educated Punk who talks the talk.

With a $25 million a year salary.

What does he care about?

His $25 million salary.

Would you become Don Lemon for $25 million?


40 posted on 11/20/2020 11:15:27 PM PST by Chuck N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson