Public perception regarding the existence of widespread election fraud will be extremely important in how the Supreme Court rules.
Why? Because the Supreme Court justices - especially conservatives - will not want to overstep their boundaries. They will not want to be seen as disenfranchising the voters.
For that reason, the SC will only weigh in if there is already widespread public distrust of the election process.
“IMO this is a SC case and why shoot your wad before you’re ready to present...”
If the election was rigged, the public needs to be convinced of it - basically a substantial percent of the voters need doubt the election is fair - they need to WANT the SC to decide it.
It is like a questionable play in sports - the players need to realize they can’t settle it - and ask the referee to settle it.
So, it is not SC justices that need to be convinced of the fraud - it is the public.
Put another way; If the public strongly trusts the election process and believes there was no significant fraud, there is no way the SC will overturn the election.
darned
I was hoping that the Supremes were more invested into the rule of law than in public relations