Posted on 11/17/2020 4:41:22 AM PST by EyesOfTX
We need proof or this thing isn’t going anywhere.
No. That doesn’t matter. It only matters if you can prove, via the servers or intelligence software, that the votes were flipped.
Trump has to have a recount with signatures checked. That will demonstrate that the system is intact, or it is all voter fraud. The latter is better for our nation, but I fear it is not intact.
You’re right. I don’t mind donating more to Trump’s defense but they really need a smoking gun for what they are asking the SCOTUS to do.
I hope they find it in time.
Believe we have to wait until the paperwork is filed.
We need proof or this thing isn’t going anywhere.
And we need it quickly or it won't matter.
I caught about five minutes of Hannity on the radio yesterday. In that five minutes he mentioned twice that he did not know if there was fraud. Must have thought his Fox bosses were listening.
If it was done well, and so far it appears to have been done well, there will be no evidence that stands up in a court.
It would be nice if she dropped “bombshells” in court.
If memory serves, she isn’t very successful with that. Just ask Flynn—who is still a convicted felon.
Makes me think of the OJ coincidences. One coincidence can be written off.
With OJ?
The whole stack of improbabilities when multiplied out point to his absolute guilt.
Hannity is a company man. All $250 M of him.
the fraud is self-evident.
but the DeepState/FakeNewsMSM/Dems want the world to believe the oil & gas State of Pennsylvania chose Biden over Trump???
15 Nov: WSJ: Editorial: Why Democrats Nearly Lost the House
The problem is their policies, not their marketing.
Democrats nearly lost their majority in the House on Nov. 3, and their post-election recriminations show the reason. They think their problem was their packaging instead of their policies...
The result may be the smallest House majority since 1919, and it’s especially shocking as Democrats reclaimed the White House. Joe Biden leads Donald Trump in the national popular vote by about 3.6%, while House Democratic candidates are ahead by only 2.1% (a margin that exaggerates the Democratic edge because more Democratic seats were uncontested). Democrats also had an incumbency advantage with three times as many Republican House Members retiring this year than Democrats. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi blamed the losses on Mr. Trump’s ability to turn out Republicans, but the results show that Mr. Biden is more popular than are House Democrats.
Democrats are now brawling over the reason, with progressives and swing-state Members blaming each other...
Swing-state Members are more realistic in that they recognize the damage from GOP ads that attacked Democrats for socialism, defunding the police, raising taxes and eliminating oil and gas drilling...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-democrats-nearly-lost-the-house-11605482291
After his previous counsel participated in the railroad job against him.
Ima gonna explode if I read bombshell or bomb again. Conservative media has gone too tabloidy.
Well, it depends on SCOTUS.
I believe there is far more than a mere smoking gun here.
I am sure the Trump team has far more than they have revealed and Sydney Powell has stated as much.
THERE IS NO DOUBT IN MIND THAT THE DEMOCRATS CHEATED USING THAT SOFTWARE AND OTHER TECHNIQUES, THE MEDIA COLLABORATED AND TRUMP WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT UNLESS THEY HAVE CORRUPTED SCOTUS
It would be nice if she dropped “bombshells” in court.
If memory serves, she isn’t very successful with that. Just ask Flynn—who is still a convicted felon.
Powell was able to undo a lot of the damage inflicted on Flynn by his first round of RINO lawyers who told him to cop to lying and everything would go away. She brought a lot of the dirty deeds of the FBI into the daylight.
An affidavit is the written version of swearing under oath to tell the truth, just as if you were testifying in a courtroom. The document is signed both by the person making the statement, called an affiant, and by a person who is legally authorized to administer an oath, such as a notary public or certain court and government officers.
Signing an affidavit that contains false information can subject the affiant to criminal penalties. Therefore, before signing, it is very important to read the document carefully to ensure that the information is accurate and truthful. If the affidavit includes any statements that are the opinion or belief of the affiant, the fact that it is opinion or belief needs to be clearly stated.
Today is the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss the case in PA. We need to have a prayer group gathered together during the hearing praying for a just outcome.
If they are allowed to be rewarded for blatantly stealing this election, right before the eyes of the world in a Venezuelan type banana republican way, there will never be a fair election here in the future. You can kiss the Georgia runoffs goodbye. No freedom loving individual will ever be elected again. Time for mighty group prayer for this country.
but they really need a smoking gun for what they are asking the SCOTUS to do.
Out of curiosity what would this smoking gun look like?
The article misses the real issue. Witness testimony can do it, c depending on the value of the witness.
But the evidence has to prove THIS election result was changed.
So far, she only has evidence the software was used to change past foreign elections.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.