Under 6% of patients in hospitals are covid patients… as a percent of available beds. ~Dr. David Samadi, MD.
Posted on 11/13/2020 11:35:51 AM PST by george76
According to The New York Times, potentially 90 percent of those who have tested positive for COVID-19 have such insignificant amounts of the virus present in their bodies that such individuals do not need to isolate nor are they candidates for contact tracing. Leading public health experts are now concerned that overtesting is responsible for misdiagnosing a huge number of people with harmless amounts of the virus in their systems.”
“’Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…’ warns The Times.”
Yes, that’s what the NY Times is confessing (8/29) [2]: “Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”
“In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”
Let me break this down for you, because it’s a lot worse than the Times admits. The rabbit hole goes much deeper—and I’ve been reporting on the deeper facts for months.
The issue appears to be the ballooning sensitivity of the PCR test. It’s so sensitive that it picks up inconsequential tiny, tiny amounts of virus that couldn’t harm a flea—and it calls these amounts “positive.”
Therefore, millions of people are labeled “positive/infected” who carry so little virus that no harm would come to them or anyone they come in contact with.
That would be bad enough. But the truth is, the PCR test is not able to produce ANY reliable number that reflects how much virus a person is carrying. A lot, a little, it doesn’t matter.
The test has never been validated, in a large-scale study, for the ability to quantify the amount of virus a person is carrying. I’ve proposed how that study should be done IN THE REAL WORLD, NOT IN THE LAB.
You take 1000 people and remove tissue samples from them. A lab puts these samples through its PCR and announces which virus it found in each case and how much virus it found in each case.
It says: “All right, in patients 23, 46, 76, 89, 265 we found a high amount of virus.”
That should mean these particular patients are visibly sick. They will have obvious clinical symptoms. Why? Because actual illness requires millions of millions of a virus replicating in the body.
So now we unblind these particular patients with high amounts of virus, according to the PCR. Are they, in fact, sick? Or are they running marathons and swimming five miles a day? Let’s see. For real.
THIS VALIDATION OF THE PCR HAS NEVER BEEN DONE.
Therefore, the claim that the PCR can determine how much virus is in a human is completely and utterly unproven. Period.
Therefore, ALL the PCR tests being done on people all over the world reflect NOTHING about illness, infection, contagion, or transmission.
The scam is wall to wall.
But there’s more.
The PCR isn’t even testing for a particular virus in the first place. It’s using a piece of RNA assumed to be part of a virus. The assumption is unproven.
And finally, as I’ve been writing and demonstrating for months, there is no evidence that researchers used proper procedure to discover “a new coronavirus that is causing a pandemic.” [3]
Therefore, the PCR test, as worthless as it already is, aims to show the presence of a germ that has never been shown to exist.
But let’s lock down the planet, destroy economies and untold numbers of lives in the process.
We already knew this. God is apparently unhappy with this nation. All of this is the finger of God about to make people pay for unrepentant hearts. Oh well....
There’s been an overwhelming number of false positives and false negatives since this whole crap began. There is no test that is 100% percent accurate. So why should we subject ourselves to a vaccine when they can’t even accurately determine who has, and who doesn’t have the virus?
this news couldn’t have coem out way before the election?
As well as all of the Xlinton & Biden scandals. And others too long to list here.
Like a fart in the wind, they magically disappear.
The Hill ^ | 11/13/20 | Jordan Williams
Posted on 11/13/2020, 6:40:38 AM by 100%FEDUP
“Something extremely bogus is going on. Was tested for covid four times today. Two tests came back negative, two came back positive,” Musk said on Twitter. “Same machine, same test, same nurse. Rapid antigen test from BD.”
I don’t know about this.
Exposure to the virus is exposure to the virus.
If they were claiming it was something else being misdiagnosed as the virus, that would be something.
I don’t know about this.
Exposure to the virus is exposure to the virus.
If they were claiming it was something else being misdiagnosed as the virus, that would be something.
Elon Musk just tweeted that “something bogus is going on”, after he tested 4 times in 2 days. 2 positive and 2 negative......
My 77 year old uncle in Michigan “tested positive” a couple weeks ago and was of course quarantined. He ended up having a grand total of ZERO symptoms.
List all the manufactured crisis they have given us to get elected recently?
The great economy crash was one.
Fauci’s Wuhan Whoopsie was another
What else?
I trust my immune system. I hope I had the Chinese Wuhan Red Death Virus.
relative?
again....
if you are in a war with bad dudes and you are the only one playing fair.. YOU WILL LOSE
pull out all the spikes ..this is a war and there are few standing with us ..Mr President
we have to fight this without all the other side has... but they dont have the one God who made the universe..
I refuse to quit.. and id fight as hard and as dirty as i had to to save this nation from their dirty hands.
God bless our President and God bless this free nation!
We have to go by hospitalizations and deaths. Forget reports of infestation.
Searched for a few minutes for statistics. Found a CDC chart. Death rate pretty steady since July with a little recent spike. Here’s where I looked:
The PCR isn’t even testing for a particular virus in the first place. It’s using a piece of RNA assumed to be part of a virus. The assumption is unproven.
I have been saying this and more for months.
It is assumed and yet the CDC says not to rely on it solely for determination as to whether one has CCP-19
Hospitalizations are up, do something is going on. Increased vitamin D deficiencies because summer is over?
So has Elon Musk been deep platform yet by facebook, or Twitter?
I wouldn’t know.
Under 6% of patients in hospitals are covid patients… as a percent of available beds. ~Dr. David Samadi, MD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.