Posted on 11/11/2020 3:59:38 PM PST by rustyweiss74
Spoken like a true atheist, Zeke.
Jope the Seniors who voted for Biden hears that.
That in the face of the clear fact—- that it is primarily the elderly who are at risk. This man is either a complete idiot or else is being paid to thin the herd of the “expensive” Medicare recipients.
So he thinks Biden’s life is no longer worthwhile.
So Zeke is going to euthanize Biteme?
Wonder if anyone’s told BiteMe.
Bet Jill loves Zeke.
75 eh? For now. Then when retirees get too uppity it’ll be 65. Then eventually we’ll get down to “Logan’s Run” territory say 30 - but only for the little people. Keep the sheep young and healthy and stupid while the elites live like kings with the best health care keeping them around into their 80s.
Frankly, if this man were allowed to cook up his own personal pandemic, it would look very much like Coronavirus, where an overwhelming percentage of actual DEATHS are among those > 75.
He is 63.
He is right.
Many people believe this sort of evil stuff. Several of my relatives say this sort of stuff. It’s a fairly common belief thanks to decades of Malthusian indoctrination in the publik skoolz.
I may be mistaken, but isn’t Joe 77?
One way to save social security. Kill the old folks. They should get the vaccine first. I had covid. It wasn’t bad that. I am not taking a vaccine.
Who needs time with Grandma and great Grand Pappy?
Understood. history can repeat itself. The original National socialists adopted a national health system and then proceeded to weed out the “useless eaters” including seriously ill, disabled, and elderly, frail.
The solution is the democrat party final solution.
Let start with Zeke and Biden and Pelosi and the Clintons etc. They are old and decrepit.
I despise ageists like this. I know several 75+-year-olds that are doing pretty well. One is even still working. I also know lots of fellow millennials that are using their youth to actively make the world worse with their Marxism.
Ahhhh, yes. The “useless eaters”.
A clear example of the difference between the cultures of love vs objects.
The culture of love protects the most vulnerable first - sanctity of human life.
The culture of objects rejects the most vulnerable first - sanctity of an objects productivity for the state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.