Posted on 11/09/2020 3:35:44 PM PST by IWONDR
"According to CBS News, President Trump does not plan to concede in the event that the media declares Joe Biden the winner of the election, and elected the 46th president of the United States. The Trump campaign and it’s top advisers called for multiple lawsuits on the grounds that the ongoing vote count would result in tallying illegally cast ballots.
The lawsuits will amount to an aggressive effort to highlight anomalies, statistical impossibilities, or other perceived problems that could affect vote counts before a final presidential winner is declared.
Many reporters at press conferences that took place in Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan on Thursday asked his political appointees and supporters for evidence of the wide-scale problems they alleged occurred.
If it is just the mathematical evidence Americans are looking for, there is endless evidence. Here are just the facts."
(Excerpt) Read more at theredelephants.com ...
It matters not.
plant-”judge” Roberts was trained in math on Epstein Island.
Bringing the evidence and the irrefutable questions to judges is key. Even if we are able to present the case(s),Roberts may simply be a total prik.
CAPS ALERT
This “mathematical evidence” is bullsh*T to any mathematician.
It’s very intelligent to assume that Dem voters predominate in mail-in votes . They’re NOT random votes.
That said... it is a good place to hide fake votes.
“This “mathematical evidence” is bullsh*T to any mathematician.”
what are you saying here?
Cue the country gibberish line from Blazing Saddles.
Benford’s law does not apply when the numbers are expectedly skewed, for rational reasons.
Not sure what you are referring to. In the article, they reference Benford’s Law, and show evidence of return tallies that appear to violate it.
Lest it be dismissed as a partisan act of desperation, Benford’s Law is apparently used in government and law enforcement analysts to sift for irregularities in data.
I am by no means skilled in math to a high degree, but I get the impression analysis with Benford’s Law is used as a tool to spot smoke where there might be fire to be found. You apparently know a bit more about this, could you elaborate?
” I get the impression analysis with Benford’s Law is used as a tool to spot smoke where there might be fire to be found. You apparently know a bit more about this, could you elaborate?”
No.
Afraid not.
Just pointing out a flaw in using it as many wish here.
It’s reasonably expected that late counted votes will tend Dem.
That’s not what the principle is measuring.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.