[hecticskeptic]

Whenever folks quote numbers, there always need to be context. So with a statement like “Democrats manufactured 450,000 votes in battleground states that miraculously ONLY have a vote for Joe Biden”, this sure sounds weird to say the least. But for it to have meaning, how many comparable ballots (in the same states) only had votes for PDJT?”

[heshtesh]

Whenever folks quote numbers, there always need to be context. So with a statement like “Democrats manufactured 450,000 votes in battleground states that miraculously ONLY have a vote for Joe Biden”, this sure sounds weird to say the least. But for it to have meaning, how many comparable ballots (in the same states) only had votes for PDJT?”

I for one would certainly like to see that metric used.

[pierrem15]

I read the usual percentage of single candidate votes is around 3%. The percentages in WI, MI and PA are well into the double digits.

From the vote counts its also obvious that there were drops of > 100K votes with only votes for Joe Biden, and then they continued manufacturing votes in MI to put the Dem Senate candidate over the top.

[Flick Lives]

Whenever folks quote numbers, there always need to be context. So with a statement like “Democrats manufactured 450,000 votes in battleground states that miraculously ONLY have a vote for Joe Biden”, this sure sounds weird to say the least. But for it to have meaning, how many comparable ballots (in the same states) only had votes for PDJT?”

—

I saw a post yesterday referencing this sort of “bullet ballot” with a single vote choice. The stats for various states were listed and the frequency of this sort of ballot was consistent from state to state and between Biden or Trump, except in the battleground states, where the frequency of single-vote for Biden ballots were like 10X.