Posted on 11/08/2020 3:21:17 PM PST by NKP_Vet
That’s what all of that “lock down” crap was for. A psyop diversionary tactic. That and pushing hard for “mail in” ballots.
President Trump saw this coming like a freight train.
I was wondering if the Chinese couldn’t just print them with an appropriate ink in the Biden bubble.
Whenever folks quote numbers, there always need to be context. So with a statement like “Democrats manufactured 450,000 votes in battleground states that miraculously ONLY have a vote for Joe Biden”, this sure sounds weird to say the least. But for it to have meaning, how many comparable ballots (in the same states) only had votes for PDJT?”
I for one would certainly like to see that metric used.
“but US Senator?”
Somehow John James was robbed.
It would be interesting. But I’d say if you voted for Trump you’d also vote “R” down the ticket to insure control of House and Senate.
Exactly
Will need hard evidence
This was all well planned, orchestrated
Need to find the gap where they got sloppy
Sidney should be the spokesperson for this effort and challenge.
When you fillin out da fake ballots in the back of da van, you got no time man, you got no time.
So would I. Bet the number of Trump only ballots is considerably less than 450,000.
Does anyone have a clue what would suffice as actual voter fraud, election fraud and standing seem to me to be the most elusive components of American law.
From the vote counts its also obvious that there were drops of > 100K votes with only votes for Joe Biden, and then they continued manufacturing votes in MI to put the Dem Senate candidate over the top.
You might just be hard pressed to find one.
We are not likely to get confessions or find the "smoking laptop" that hacked voting machines.
The federal government uses statistics all the time to sue in court successfully. These challenges by the Trump campaign are not (yet) criminal cases. The "Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt" standard does not apply.
There’s probably some cold sweat breaking out among the criminals in WI, MI, PA and NV that Trump won’t give up and may prevail, in which case he will have four years to bring their butts to justice.
I don’t know, but I’d say having more voters than registered voters should be something. Or a garbage bag full of ballots, testimony from postal workers that they changed dates on ballots, etc.
They are few and far between.
Signature match, ballots must be signed and that voter must verify that they cast that ballot.
Whenever folks quote numbers, there always need to be context. So with a statement like “Democrats manufactured 450,000 votes in battleground states that miraculously ONLY have a vote for Joe Biden”, this sure sounds weird to say the least. But for it to have meaning, how many comparable ballots (in the same states) only had votes for PDJT?”
—
I saw a post yesterday referencing this sort of “bullet ballot” with a single vote choice. The stats for various states were listed and the frequency of this sort of ballot was consistent from state to state and between Biden or Trump, except in the battleground states, where the frequency of single-vote for Biden ballots were like 10X.
The last 3 potus cycles,approx 5 pct of voters across all 50 states split ballots between potus and senate
That means 95% voted party line..
Red and blue
Title 10 USC - The Insurrection Act...
Ҥ253. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.”
A concerted, large-scale effort to steal a national election clearly deprives the people who voted of a right secured by the Constitution and by law. States and local governments have clearly failed or refused to protect that right. There are numerous locations in several states that now have documents which is evidence and people who can provide testimony in court to bring the perpetrators to justice - but this evidence and these witnesses need to be preserved and protected. The in depth recount and examination of hundreds of thousands of ballots will need large numbers of people [other than those who did the original counting, as they are possible subjects/witnesses].......The Insurrection Act fits, it will allow us to avail ourselves of the assets necessary [military personnel and vehicles] to preserve, process and protect the evidence and witnesses from further tampering or destruction (already occuring) and will raise the level of possible punishment of those found guilty of attempting to overthrow our government. The Insurrection Act should be invoked to further the prosecutions and punishments that are necessary. Would appreciate reasoned arguments. God Save the Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.