Posted on 11/07/2020 8:17:06 AM PST by rustyweiss74
"I think there are any number of things they need to investigate including the likelihood that 3% of the vote total was changed in the pre-election voting ballots that were collected digitally by using the hammer program and a software program called scorecard. That would have amounted to a massive change in the vote that would have gone across the country and explains a lot of what were seeing. In addition, they ran an algorithm to calculate votes they might need to come up with for Mr. Biden in specific areas. I think that explains what happened in Michigan where the computer glitch resulted in a change of votes of about 5500 in favor of President Trump. All those districts need to be checked for that same, quote, software glitch, end quote, that would change the result in Michigan dramatically. The same thing is happening in other states. Weve had hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appear solely for Mr. Biden which is statistically impossible as a matter of mathematics. It can all be documented."
p
Trump Team Sets Up Voter Fraud Report Website as Evidence Piles Up
https://www.ammoland.com/2020/11/trump-team-sets-up-voter-fraud-report-website-as-evidence-piles-up/
https://defendyourballot.formstack.com/forms/incident_report
This is not something where you need 50 election workers to be in a conspiracy. That is far too dangerous a plan. Someone would talk.
Its the tabulator software.
I added up all the House races Dem candidates in Wisconsin. They add to 104,000 fewer votes than Biden got. Nobody slipped 104,000 pieces of paper into a pile. That would require too many people in too many counties in a conspiracy.
MORE IMPORTANT, this 104K count differential does not exist in other states. I checked several. The difference in them is a few thousand AND . . . AND . . . in 2016 Wisconsin the Hillary differential is only a few thousand. This 104,000 difference is absurd.
Gotta be in the software. And there is probably a Test mode where hand counted ballots are sent through and found accurate. But in normal mode . . . .
This conspiracy would not have to be very big.
Hammer on the clock
Can you show how you did that?
That is point to the databases you used so that others can review and verify the same information.
Good to see someone using district, media stories have used state as opposed to district/ward to compare vote counts for registration.
A software glitch aka feature
Thanks for the info
No way those big batches that voted 100% Biteme are legit
Discussion about Hammer and scorecard.
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/radio/audio/brannon-howse-november-4-2020
Posted somewhere on FR last night, it was mentioned that John Brennan and James Clapper own the company that owns Hammer and Scorecard software. Apparently, Hammer/Scorecard was developed by US spooks.
Also, it is likely that the entire suite of Hammer/Scorecard can switch to different algorithms for different states. This could be controlled by password/codes that are entered so that different areas tabulate votes differently. No reason to expect a hardwired fraud package that can’t be tailored specifically for different areas, due to conditions being so different across the country.
Online stuff. Wiki for the Hillary numbers.
Various CNN or other media places, I think the SOS site.
That’s a good question. I should have gotten links for all, but it’s all public info. There aren’t that many House seats in WI. Just add up the Dem candidate votes on a hand calculator.
Then I did hmm Colorado, New Hampshire, I think a few others. It is certainly possible a state I did not check also shows a huge differential. I’m one guy just looking around. I encourage others to duplicate the procedure.
If you knew it was occurring why not have it already set up before the election?
It was. So (if the rumors are credible) you cant catch a robber until he robs the bank. So the only way to catch “Russians” stealing the vote is to secure the vote without the “Russians” knowing it. Only the “Russians” all along have been democraps. The recount is where the trap is sprung. Trump is way too smart and has been way too quiet. Its not his way. Thats why what ever they call the race, nit only will he expose the Democraps, but take the media out as well. All the Networks just xalled it for Biden. Let the games begin!
He would know how to investigate the entire program to catch those who re-tooled it.
Here's a happy thought: by using a military technology, the evil-doers crossed into the realm of "waging war against the United States."
Is ‘MenRec’ a gay porn site?
This is not something where you need 50 election workers to be in a conspiracy.
—
Apparently, there were many hundreds of poll workers with Antifa and other radicals in a Detroit polling place. The only ones talking are Republicans.
I just want to pass your due diligence around for others to check.
It would be helpful if you would provide the exact links from which you pulled your data forensics so that others could go to them quickly and do their analysis—so as to independently verify your work.
Application known as SCORECARD that is capable of hacking into elections and stealing the vote, according to**CIA contractor**-turned-whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, who designed and built THE HAMMER.
WOW media just turned ghost white.
During the last election for governor in Kentucky, I ran across a live streaming video by Millennium Millie that documented ongoing fraud in that race. She showed the moment that 560 votes were subtracted from Bevin and given to Beshear. Also, it was alleged that vote counting software could be programmed to award .85 (or any number) for each vote while giving 1.15 (or other number) to the other candidate. In the governor's race, the computer was increasing/decreasing vote totals by a pre-selected number at selected times.
Ping to post #14
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.