[snarkytart]

of course...I mean she’s a decent smart qualified woman.

[reg45]

Roe v. Wade violates the Tenth Amendment. Abortion is not in the province of the Federal Government. Each state must decide how it will handle it. Therefore, each state will have different rules.

[stanne]

The American people of course wanted her in as SC Justice. The American people voted I DJT as well as the senate. End of story. No matter how loud the democrats yell

[No_Mas_Obama]

Paul Mirengoff @ PowerLine is an odd sort of never-Trumper who writes 500 words to say what most of us could express in 20 words or less.

[colorado tanker]

Yes she is attractive with great family values and an originalist philosophy and all that. But I also think she’s smarter and more articulate than all of the other justices on the bench today. If elections fall right she could be a future Chief Justice.

[metmom]

I think we can say, though, that the Senate Democrats’ attacks on Barrett fell flat. The claim that Barrett will provide the vote that kills Obamacare didn’t seem to move the needle against her. Nor did the more plausible (though still highly speculative) claim that she will be the vote that overturns Roe v. Wade.

Most people likely realized that dems were just blowing hot air. I doubt any really believed she’s going to destroy people’s health insurance, as if obamacare even qualifies as that.